Call For Writers: Unlikeable Women

Call For Writers: Unlikeable Women

Call-for-Writers-e1385943740501

Our theme week for February 2015 will be Unlikeable Women.

Representations of female antiheroines are on the rise. Contemporary audiences love morally ambiguous female characters who are hard, powerful, and determined. The soft-spoken but ruthless Claire Underwood of House of Cards is a prime example of women we love to hate, who push or ignore boundaries to get what they want. The elegant antiheroines who tend to be wealthy, goal-driven, and charismatic (Olivia Pope of Scandal, Patty Hewes of Damages, or Angelina Jolie’s Maleficent), while comparable, are a slightly different breed from the outright unlikeable women who are popping up all over film and television.

Whiny, self-obsessed Piper Chapman of Orange is the New Black and Hannah Horvath of Girls are perfect examples of these downright unlikeable female characters. What sets them apart from the traditional antiheroine archetype? Michelle Jurgen of Mic posits,

“It’s alienating simply because we’re not used to being served up unpalatable women: women who are naked just because, who give themselves terrible haircuts, and who are frank, judgmental and do whatever they want without regard for others. Women who act in a way we’re used to seeing only male characters act, which has unfairly branded them unlikable rather than well-crafted and complex.”

Jurgen further goes on to suggest that it is the humanness of these antiheroines that is difficult for audiences to stomach. Along with Piper and Hannah are characters like Cersei Lannister of Game of Thrones and Annalise Keating of How to Get Away with Murder who are equally vulnerable. They’re petty, manipulative, and needy. They make mistakes, often stupid mistakes, and they’re usually in damage-control mode, putting out the fires they either set or caused to be set.

If these unlikeable women are so “unpalatable,” why are they still being created? Why are we still watching them? Why are these productions winning so many awards and accolades?

Feel free to use the examples below to inspire your writing on this subject, or choose your own source material.

We’d like to avoid as much overlap as possible for this theme, so get your proposals in early if you know which film you’d like to write about. We accept both original pieces and cross-posts, and we respond to queries within a week.

Most of our pieces are between 1,000 and 2,000 words, and include links and images. Please send your piece as a Microsoft Word document to btchflcks[at]gmail[dot]com, including links to all images, and include a 2- to 3-sentence bio.

If you have written for us before, please indicate that in your proposal, and if not, send a writing sample if possible.

Please be familiar with our publication and look over recent and popular posts to get an idea of Bitch Flicks’ style and purpose. We encourage writers to use our search function to see if your topic has been written about before, and link when appropriate (hyperlinks to sources are welcome, as well).

The final due date for these submissions is Friday, Feb. 20 by midnight.

House of Cards

Damages

Scandal

How to Get Away with Murder

Game of Thrones

Girls

Orange is the New Black

Dangerous Liaisons

Once Upon a Time

Maleficent

Fatal Attraction

Breaking Bad

Revenge

Sex and the City

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Adventure Time’: Why Lumpy Space Princess is Important

LSP’s character design can barely be called feminine in the ways that we as a society code things feminine. This is especially true if you compare her to other female characters on ‘Adventure Time’ such as Flame Princess and Princess Bubblegum. Her gender markers are the fact that her name is Lumpy Space Princess, the fact that she is pink, and that her speech takes on the patterns and vernacular of a valley girl although her actual voice is low and not immediately parse-able as feminine. The other main gender marker of LSP is the fact that she is into traditionally feminine things such as shopping and make up.

Written by Gaayathri Nair as part of our theme week on Children’s Television.

Thanks to my friend Kaz whose thoughts added much to this post.

Adventure Time has long been admired by feminists and for good reason. On its face, the show is just another buddy comedy type cartoon with its lead protagonists–Jake the dog and Finn the human–two dudes who go on adventures together that are often bizarre and hilarious. However, that description denies the complexity of the show, which deals with themes as diverse as depression, trauma, temporary disability, bullying, dating, relationships, and so much more. The show has many interesting and diverse female characters. One of the most interesting characters on the show is Lumpy Space Princess, commonly known as LSP.

LSP’s character design can barely be called feminine in the ways that we as a society code things feminine. This is especially true if you compare her to other female characters on Adventure Time such as Flame Princess and Princess Bubblegum. Her gender markers are the fact that her name is Lumpy Space Princess, the fact that she is pink, and that her speech takes on the patterns and vernacular of a valley girl although her actual voice is low and not immediately parse-able as feminine. The other main gender marker of LSP is the fact that she is into traditionally feminine things such as shopping and makeup.

images (1)

One of her defining characteristics is that LSP is completely unapologetic, often rude, and sometimes vulgar. LSP seems to personify all the negative things we are supposed to believe about women in that she is shallow, vain, not interested in serious things like actually ruling her kingdom, and boy crazy. On top of all that she does this without having any of the things we are supposed to think of as “womanly virtues” like being kind, or gentle, or compassionate. In a traditional fairy tale or even in more contemporary narratives, LSP would automatically be coded as a villain. She ticks all the boxes – she is confident, obsessed with her appearance, and not very nice.

However in Adventure Time, LSP is not a villain, she is a friend of Finn and Jake. Sometimes they don’t really get her but that’s cool, people can be different from each other and still be friends. She sometimes manages to help them out but often screws things up because she is really selfish and also not very self-aware.  For this reason, LSP is a pretty polarizing character in the fandom. People seem to either love her or hate her and to be fair her self-centeredness does lead her to do some awful things. For example in a recent episode Finn decided he wanted to try and cope with his depression over losing his arm by trying to “make out” with lots of people. One of these people is LSP but she is unsatisfied with Finn’s definition of “making out,” which is a chaste kiss on the lips and she forcibly pulls Finn into a deeper kiss when he explicitly told her he didn’t want to. The show doesn’t really process this; it seems to further cement Finn’s depression and make him question whether “making out” is the best way for Finn to cope with not really being able to feel things.  It would have been better had the show found a way for Finn to communicate to LSP that her behavior was not acceptable even though they are friends, but it makes sense for that not to happen because Finn was conflicted about his own behavior and just generally numb about what is going on in his life.

I find interesting, however, that LSP often attracts so much vitriol as the male version of her character, a male person who is self- absorbed, confident, brash and horrible to the people around him is often a very celebrated trope. Think about characters like House or Sherlockof course these characters have an additional quality as they are imbued with the traditionally masculine virtue of being brilliant or incredibly talented/gifted.

images (2)

LSP gets no such pass because she is not brilliant, she is just vain and annoying and a lot of the hate she gets boils down to “she thinks she’s so awesome but she’s not.” Even if she was brilliant at something in the way that Princess Bubblegum is, I don’t think she would be embraced in the same way a male character with her disposition would. Look at Meryl Streep’s character in The Devil Wears Prada; despite being imbued with pretty much all of the same qualities as the male characters I discussed earlier she is automatically coded as villainous. While we begin to understand more about her as the movie progresses, she never really loses that shadow of villainy.

I think the existence of LSP is an great thing. To have an unlikeable female character who is not immediately cast as a villain is so rare but I sometimes worry that the joke is meant to be exactly what a lot of people think about LSP, that she thinks she’s so great when it is clear to us as the viewers that she is not actually. I want the joke to be LSP is as exactly as awesome as she thinks she is, but she needs to learn how to learn how to be a better friend and respect other people’s boundaries. That is something that I find much more compelling–everyone needs to learn things as we grow up and LSP is no exception. This doesn’t mean her personality needs to change completely; she just needs to learn how to be more considerate. I hope the writers choose to go in this direction rather making LSP a two-dimensional joke.

images


Gaayathri Nair is currently living and writing in Auckland, New Zealand. You can find more of her work at her blog A Human Story and tweet her @A_Gaayathri.