The Superficial Yet Satisfying Feminism of ‘Agent Carter’

It’s not just seeing a badass chick beat the wide ties off of sexist dudes with a stapler that makes ‘Agent Carter’ so gratifying (although that’s a big part of it). I’ve been lucky enough to live my adult life in a post-‘Xena’ and ‘Buffy’ world where I can count on a fairly steady stream of ladies who can kick butt in my media. I think the heart of what makes ‘Agent Carter’ feel like a feminist triumph is that we are watching a would-be love interest as the hero of her own story

Promo image for 'Agent Carter'
Promo image for 'Agent Carter'
Promo image for ‘Agent Carter’

Let me be perfectly clear: I loved the premiere of Marvel’s Agent CarterI was already a huge fan of the character from the Captain America movies and her Marvel One-Shot short film, and these first two episodes of her new TV series lived up to my high expectations.

The best word I can think of to describe the show is satisfying. Watching it feels like slipping into a warm bubble bath or necking an ice-cold beer. Or doing both at the same time.  And you have a pizza.

Agent Carter at work.
Agent Carter at work.

 

It’s New York, 1946, and Hayley Atwell’s Peggy Carter is an agent with the Strategic Scientific Reserve. Despite her clout during the war, she’s now the sole female agent in her office and is treated as a secretary. Enter Howard Stark with a secret mission for her to clear his name while saving the world from his stolen weaponry, and Agent Carter has a lot of spying and fighting to do on top of her usual daily sassing of her sexist co-workers. She puts chauvinist jerks in their place, she kicks guys in the face, and she looks great (and I mean great) doing it: “weaponized femininity” is laid on so thick here she actually knocks a guy out with her “Sweet Dreams” spy lipstick.

I might leave my husband for this gold dress.
I might leave my husband for this gold dress.

 

But it’s not just seeing a badass chick beat the wide ties off of sexist dudes with a stapler that makes Agent Carter so gratifying (although that’s a big part of it). I’ve been lucky enough to live my adult life in a post-Xena and Buffy world where I can count on a fairly steady stream of ladies who can kick butt in my media.

But I think the heart of what makes Agent Carter feel like a feminist triumph is that we are watching a would-be love interest as the hero of her own story. As tumblr user mcpricekissed put it:

it would be so cool to have a superhero movie or a show where the story starts with a hero kicking ass but then he dies and his so called love interest takes over and finishes off his job oh wait that’s literally happening with agent carter

Peggy mourns Steve Rogers the way male action heroes morn their tragically dead wives/girlfriends/daughters. Captain America himself is this woman’s tragic backstory. Re-positioning Peggy as the central character this way is not only satisfying from a feminist perspective, it also helps overcome the also-ran status of a TV tie-in to a billion dollar film franchise.

Peggy after Captain America's "death" in 'The First Avenger'
Peggy after Captain America’s “death” in The First Avenger

 

Unfortunately, the show still felt the need to kill off a supporting female character in the pilot to add to Peggy’s guilt pile, either because we know Cap isn’t really dead, or because there is some obscure Writers Guild bylaw where the blood of a female character must be spilt in the first episode of any action series to appease the cruel and vicious gods of television.

And here’s where I get to the rub with Agent Carter. While the first word I use to describe it is satisfying, the second is indulgent.  This is feel-good feminism knocking down cartoonishly chauvinist straw men from the Bad Old Days, so we can pat ourselves on the back for how far we’ve come, and not worry about the complicated problems of the present. But just because something feminist is set in the 1940s doesn’t mean it has to embody old-fashioned feminism, with its total disregard for all the other systems of oppression that intersect with the patriarchy.

Peggy's sexist co-workers
Agent Carter‘s simple representation of the patriarchy: chauvinist co-workers

 

But just as several clever feminist commentators worried it would be, Agent Carter‘s feminism is fairly one-dimensional. There are little glimmers of commentary on class and disability, but both as they specifically relate to the post-war era. Where the show really fails is race, with its all-white cast and absurd under/mis-use of its only person of color with a speaking role in these two episodes, Andre Royo’s Harlem night club owner who is a) in cahoots with the bad guys and b) ends up dead.

To quote another tumblr user, duvallon:

love it when a show set in the late ’40s/early ’50s RELENTLESSLY addresses misogyny against white women but ignores race while using people of color as expendable villains

it’s just great

There are six more episodes of Agent Carter, and hopefully we’ll see improved representation and more thoughtful, truer feminism as the season progresses. If not, then I, as a white feminist who tries not to be a White Feminist, will face the arduous task of forcing myself to not unconditionally love Agent Carter.


Robin Hitchcock is an American writer living in Cape Town who is now shopping for a red hat.

10 thoughts on “The Superficial Yet Satisfying Feminism of ‘Agent Carter’”

  1. Wow,im really encouraged by the article. you really identified a problem that i see many american period pieces tend to miss when it comes to race. Feminism is definitely important, but there are/were other overt problems during these times and intentionality among movements is very important. I hope im wrong, but i think it may go “Mad Men” where they show gender politics very well, but does not quite have the same level of creativity when it comes to the racial politics of the time. They are creative but, there are no core non white characters to make the subject stick quite as well. Im not sure if the MCU can do race, cause its never been mentioned on any level in any show/movie. In the first Captain America, the armies were integrated when in reality ,they were segregated. If they do touch on it, it will be just that, a touch with broad acknowledgement. I think it just the writers feel its more complicated to inject racial politics into this show on the level the gender politics will be. With that being said, i still like the show, but it is somethin i cant help but notice in period shows.

  2. Thanks to the post I’m watching the show now, If it’s not perfect, it is really good (way better that Shield)

  3. 1. OMG OMG OMG OMG! You linked to my essay! *fangirls*
    2. I totally agree. While I really enjoy the show (Hayley Atwell is brilliant and I love the way they take the time to show her playing into the patriarchy where she needs to in order to later confront it) but heavy handed sexism of her co-workers and ra-ra feminism of her actions REALLY highlights how white the show is. We’ve got this story that is going to great lengths to show that women are capable too, from Peggy herself, the waitress in the bar, to the roomie who was laid off when the men came home, but we’re left wondering what happened to the OTHER women. I actually sat and thought for a little while about where a black woman like myself would find herself in Peggy’s time, and whether or not I even really wanted another reproduction of subservient BW onscreen.
    3. Either way, I think you hit the nail on the head re: indulgent. That’s the perfect way to describe it and I feel the same way about this as I do about GIRLS: If I can relate to this enough to see myself in it, then why don’t the creators relate to ME enough to reflect me onscreen?

  4. Always fascinated to hear the diverse opinions on new female characters, since it constantly feels like we’re searching for a “sweet spot,” but either overshoot it or screw it up while thinking we’re clever.

    I feel like combating misogyny isn’t the cure, it’s illustrating either HOW it affects women (Which the third episode does pretty well) or WHY it is allowed to exist (which is a much harder prospect)

    But like Joss Whedon says; “Over and over, until we get it right.”

  5. Why not making the show about gay rights too? Or about any other minority?
    There is finally a show which deals with sexism during the era. Finally something which doesn’t put a heavy dose of nostalgia over this particular period. Doing a balanced job on showing this is already difficult, and now it also has to adress race issues? During a period in which more than 90 percent of the population in New York was white? If predjuices have to get adressed, wouldn’t it make much more sense to show, for example, Irish characters?
    All in all…I feel that she should celebrate what this show is instead of starting to complain about what else it could or should have been. We have eight episodes for now. The topic of those eight episodes are Agent Carter’s struggle against sexism. Perhaps they will adress race issues down the line. Perhaps they won’t. But I will in any case appreciate the show for what it is, and hope that it will be enough to change things for the better.

Comments are closed.