Movie Review: Persepolis


Persepolis. (2007) Written and directed by Marjane Satrapi and Vincent Paronnaud.

I rented Persepolis before the recent Iranian election, and have been thinking ever since about the film.

Persepolis is adapted from the autobiographical graphic novels written by Marjane Satrapi (which I haven’t read), and represents the first graphic-novel-as-film. Other graphic novels have been made into films, but none (to my knowledge) have remained as true to form as this. Visually, the film is lovely, stark, and at times deeply disturbing.

In Persepolis, we meet Marjane, a young girl living in Iran at the time of the Islamic revolution of 1979. The society changed drastically under Islamic law, as evidenced by Marjane’s teacher’s evolving lessons. After the revolution, in 1982, she tells the young girls, who are now required by law to cover their heads, “The veil stands for freedom. A decent woman shelters herself from men’s eyes. A woman who shows herself will burn in hell.” In typical fashion, the students escape her ideological droning through imported pop culture: the music of ABBA, The Bee Gees, Michael Jackson, and Iron Maiden.

While the film is a personal story, it does offer a concise history of modern Iran, including the U.S. involvement in the rise of Islamic law and in the Iran-Iraq war. This time in Iranian history is especially important right now, with the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the ensuing protests. One scene in particular depicts a group of people protesting when a young man is shot, bleeds to death, and is hoisted over his fellow protesters’ shoulders–eerily reminiscent of what happened with Neda Agha Soltan, whose public murder has rallied the Iranian protesters and people all over the world.

The history of Iran, while it determines the course of Marjane’s life, really is a backdrop—especially in the second half of the movie. In other words, the film is more about the experience of one woman than a documentary-style account of Iranian history. Once Marjane escapes the society she grew up in, her problems become much more ordinary for a Western audience, more commonplace. She vacillates between different crowds of people. She falls in love and has her heart broken. She feels angst and confusion over who she is and what she wants. She goes home to Iran for a time and, like so many others, ultimately finds she cannot return home.

As evident in the film, Satrapi grew up in a wealthy, educated, progressive Iranian family. They sent her to Vienna as a teenager so she didn’t have to spend her adolescence in such a repressive society, and because they feared what might happen to such an outspoken young woman there. While acknowledging her privilege, not many women in circumstances other than these would be able to accomplish what she has. Satrapi isn’t afraid to show missteps she makes in growing up, either. Young Marjane learns that her femininity, even when repressed by law, offers great power—and shows how she misuses that power. Missing her mother’s lesson at the grocery store about female solidarity, she blames other women for her troubles (“Ma’am, my mother is dead. My stepmother’s so cruel. If I’m late, she’ll kill me. She’ll burn me with an iron. She’ll make my dad put me in an orphanage.”), and falsely accuses a man of looking at her in public to avoid the law coming down on her.

Persepolis is, in every definition of the term, a feminist film. There are strong, interesting female characters who sometimes make mistakes. The women, like in real life, are engaged in politics and struggle with expectations set for them and that they set for themselves. They have relationships with various people, but their lives are not defined by one romantic relationship, even though sometimes it can feel that way.

As much as I like this movie, I can’t help but write this review through the lens of an interview Satrapi gave in 2004, in which she claimed to not be a feminist and displayed ignorance of the basic concept of feminism. I simply don’t believe gender inequality can be dissolved through basic humanism—especially in oppressive patriarchal societies like Iran. I wonder if feminism represents too radical a position to non-Westerners, and if her statements were more strategy than sincerity. Making feminism an enemy or perpetuating the post-feminist rhetoric isn’t going to help anyone. That said, this is a very good movie and I highly recommend it.

The official trailer:

A couple of good articles about women’s role in the recent Iranian protests:

The Nation: Icons of the New Iran by Barbara Crossette

Feminist Peace Network: Memo to ABC: Lipstick Revolution FAIL

Post your own links–and thoughts about Persepolis–in the comments.

5 thoughts on “Movie Review: Persepolis”

  1. An great film, indeed. But I can’t help myself from saying that the first book is superb, better than the film and the other books. For me the first book represents what’s best about contemporary moments of “girl culture.” There are very few girl characters in literature, pop culture, etc. like Marjane: interested in politics, engaged in philosophy, etc. Often girl culture is wrought as “girl power,” pinkified, and sold back to girls against their better interests. I could go on, ha ha. Marjane is articulate and funny without reliance on cuteness or saccharine-sweetness–she is a fully developed character. In the book there are some turns of phrase, etc. that are just so precious and well-done. I taught this book in a basic writing class, which I had themed “growing up in times of unrest or oppression.” I know, a really upper–ha ha. We read about Emmett Till and others. Also, I had a student whose mom was Iranian so she could translate the Farsi/Persian. My students had, for the most part, never encountered a character like Marjane.

    My friend Ben recently sent me this, which really represents what’s so great about remix, juxtaposition, and making new. Here we have graphics from Persepolis and the words have been replaced to represent the recent issues surrounding the Iranian election. Brilliant. http://www.spreadpersepolis.com/

  2. I, like Abby, enjoyed the film for its representation of a particular girhood. After reading the novels I became interested in Iranian politics and feminisms but I don’t think that Persepolis is the best film to explore these issues. But the legnth may be an issue here as it is a ninety minute film of two books and two decades of a woman’s eventful life.

    Unlike you Amber I didn’t feel that the film showed adequate awareness of Marjane’s privilege and I felt very much that it was the story of the intellectual’s Iran. This is always the issue with autobiographical work though.

    But these are small criticisms when compared to the beauty and wit of the film. I really loved it.

  3. How disappointing that Satrapi claimed to be ignorant of feminism. Her movie is marvelous and most definitely feminist.

    I think that, at least while she’s young, it makes sense that Marjane is not aware of her privilege–she’s a kid who hangs around with kids like herself. But as a grown-up, it would have been nice of her to acknowledge her class privilege.

Comments are closed.